SOME COMMENTS FROM AGWPJA JUDGE SETH RESNICK
"Having judged several [AG]WPJA contests has really been a benefit for me. I feel I am now better acquainted with the quality of work produced and the associated
pros and cons of any contest. There are several things that strike me and I feel that it is important for the photographers who entered the contest to understand some
of these feelings. If picking the top twenty images in each category was the only criteria, my job would be much easier but unfortunately that is not the case and in
many cases I was torn. The other conditions I must take into account is to determine if the image is in the right category and I must also judge the image based on the
PS work done on the image. It is the last criteria that really throws me for a loop. Why? As someone who has worked with Adobe in development since the very early days
of Photoshop, I have a broad understanding of how the product works. Today, since most images are shot digitally, virtually all images are adjusted in Photoshop,
Lightroom or a similar product. So technically Photoshop automatically plays a part in the process. That said, the concept of "Photoshoping an image" means different
things to different folks. This isn't simply a matter of technical merit but also a personal perspective on Photoshop. Understanding my feelings on this may better
help you understand why I chose one image over another. This is not simply a matter of right or wrong but there is a lot of subjectivity involved as well. I personally
dislike images that use Photoshop to change tone and color as a means of distracting you from the image being out of focus for example. As a photojournalist myself,
working for both newspapers and magazines I always felt the image simply had to be sharp. I also personally dislike images that look like Photoshop simply because the
contest or assignment requires Photoshop. In my mind Photoshop should enhance an already dramatic image, or in the case of compositing it should help create drama with
existing components. I dislike images that look cheesy with an overuse of Photoshop. I also expect basic Photoshop skills like cropping out or cloning out
distractions, dust removal, and proper use of curves and adjustments. Ultimately for me, the image must be a striking one and Photoshop should be deployed to make the
already great even better.
One additional note. I make Photoshop comments in the majority of images. I am doing this not to be critical but to hopefully be helpful and point out small things
that would enhance the images. I chose to do this because Photoshop use is one of the criteria of the contest. Lastly, although it took an incredible amount of time to
do, I did make my recommended Photoshop corrections to the images (for myself on my own computer) so I could compare the before and after. The one thing that really
stood out in terms of Photoshop work was the lack of detail in many dresses. Understandably, the contrast of a black tux and a white dress produces a wide range of
tone but with just a little bit of work most of the dresses could be dramatically improved."
THE TOP TWENTY PHOTOGRAPHERS FROM THE Q1 '09 CONTEST
| 01. Marc Pagani, Louisiana |
11. Ron Storer, Washington |
| 02. Dino Lara, Philippines |
12. Bryan Kit F., Singapore |
| 03. Derrick Ong, Singapore |
13. Jayme Morrison, Canada |
| 04. Matthias Richter, Germany |
14. Julie Ambos, Florida |
| 05. Elaine Soong, Canada |
15. Joelle Susan, South Carolina |
| 06. Stephen Loh, Singapore |
16. Joseph Kohn, California |
| 07. Dean Dampney, Australia |
17. Raymond Phang, Singapore |
| 08. Ricky Salim, Indonesia |
18. Kori Hudson, Arkansas |
| 09. Sol Tamargo, Mexico |
19. Aziz Khan, England |
| 10. Marcin Labedzki, Poland |
20. Ryan Browne, England |
Getting Ready
Entries which spontaneously capture the prepping, grooming, arranging, outfitting, and anticipation before the ceremony.
Top Ten Winners From This Category:
| 01. Matthias Richter, Germany |
06. Marc Pagani, Louisiana |
| 02. Marc Pagani, Louisiana |
07. Kori Hudson, Arkansas |
| 03. Dean Dampney, Australia |
08. Adam Trzcionka, Poland |
| 04. Jayme Morrison, Canada |
09. Ryan Jones, California |
| 05. Joelle Susan, South Carolina |
10. Alex Tan, Singapore |
|
Ceremony
Images that capture guests and participants throughout pre-ceremony, vow-exchange, and receiving line activity.
Top Ten Winners From This Category:
| 01. Derrick Ong, Singapore |
06. Aziz Khan, England |
| 02. Ricky Salim, Indonesia |
07. Julie Ambos, Florida |
| 03. Stephen Loh, Singapore |
08. John Schnack, California |
| 04. Dean Dampney, Australia |
09. Bryan Kit F., Singapore |
| 05. Julie Ambos, Florida |
10. Allister Freeman, England |
|
Reception
Photographs that document festivities from the cocktail hour through the last dance and departure.
Top Ten Winners From This Category:
| 01. Dino Lara, Philippines |
06. Ryan Browne, England |
| 02. Marc Pagani, Louisiana |
07. Kori Hudson, Arkansas |
| 03. Ron Storer, Washington |
08. Dino Lara, Philippines |
| 04. Bryan Kit F., Singapore |
09. Dino Lara, Philippines |
| 05. Joseph Kohn, California |
10. Katherine Birkbeck, Georgia |
|
Wedding Day or Engagement Portrait
Photographs that demonstrate the photographer's ability to create an artistic environmental portrait of the bride and groom taken either on the wedding day itself or from
an engagement portrait session.
Top Ten Winners From This Category:
| 01. Elaine Soong, Canada |
06. Stephen Loh, Singapore |
| 02. Sol Tamargo, Mexico |
07. Fer Juaristi, Mexico |
| 03. Marcin Labedzki, Poland |
08. Marzena Wasilewska, Aus |
| 04. Stephen Loh, Singapore |
09. Derrick Ong, Singapore |
| 05. Raymond Phang, Singapore |
10. Marcus Mokros, Switzerland |
|
CONTEST SPONSORS
|
D-65 is a company dedicated to educating photographers. They work with the industry to offer new ways of thinking, while incorporating the latest
technologies. Their services include digital workflow workshops, seminars, bidding and production for still photo shoots, digital workflow analysis for studios and agencies,
legal witness on copyright cases, private consulting along with marketing strategies and portfolio reviews. D-65 provides quality professionalism, while understanding the
needs of photographers and creative individuals.
Click here for more information about these D-65 workshops |
2009 DATES
Boston: Jun 12th - 15th
Seattle: Aug 14th - 17th
Chicago: Sep 11th - 14th
New York: Oct 2nd - 5th
Los Angeles: Nov 13th - 16th
New Orleans: Dec 11th - 14th
|
|
Creative Motion Design builds customizable Flash website templates for professional photographers. Each website includes an online content management
system that allows users to instantly build, maintain, and update their own professional website. With features like the Proofing Cart, Search Engine Optimization, Custom
Design Service, one FREE year of Hosting and much more, CMD has the tools to take your portfolio to the next level.
With websites starting at $195, they have a product that will fit most budgets. [AG]WPJA members will receive a *$200.00* discount on any CMD Elite website.
Learn more about what Creative Motion Design can do for you!
|
MEMBERS RECEIVE
$200.00 off any Elite Design
Use Promo Code 'wpjadiscount'
FREE 10-day Trial
Call 888-228-0399
(ext. 1) for details!
|
|
|